Canon also has simpler distortion, (but both needs correction anyway). From what I know, the 17-35/2.8 is slightly inferior opticaly to 17-40/4, but of course the 2.8 is nice and it can be bought cheap. the 17-40 is a decent lens, but I'm afraid, that for a real upgrade, you have to go for either 16-35 mkI or mkII. John Riley reviews the new Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L III USM wide-angle lens for full-frame Canon EF mount cameras. Used Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L II USM. Samyang AF 35-150mm f/2-2.8 FE Lens B&H Deal Zone: Manfrotto Pro Light Reloader Air-55 Carry-On Camera Roller Bag – Only $249.88 (Save $250.00), Impact PowerSync Kit. More Canon & Sony News. Free Newsletter . Bryan Recommends. View the MTF average test results measured by the ultra-high precision Trioptics Imagemaster MTF bench. Compare the MTF results various lenses.
The obvious competitor for the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L IS USM lens is its predecessor, the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM. The older design offers a very good performance and is a very sharp lens. The IS model is a tad sharper but honestly, its splitting hairs. The newer model does have weather sealing, better bokeh and better handling of flare but the
A thin Canon LP1219 Lens Pouch is also included in the 16-35 L IS box. Canon's pouches protect against dust and scratches, but a better storage option should be used for protection from impact. Below is a visual comparison between the following lenses: Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Lens Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II
. 964701349453492271129
